[SIZE=3][B]Secoundary School mathematica and Evidence Michelson Morley False[/B] [/SIZE]
[RIGHT]author
Maciej Marian Marosz ( Poland ,city Walbrzych ) 11-11-2014 [/RIGHT]

if  C + V or C- V = TRUE ===> below drawing is FALSE
( EM wave are not able  make rotation with bulb  respect to hand because not exist C+V)
[url=http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Mry0nxUU74M/VGBy5Uta3pI/AAAAAAAACFg/B68sugnYIr4/s1600/MMR.jpg]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Mry0nxUU74M/VGBy5Uta3pI/AAAAAAAACFg/B68sugnYIr4/s1600/MMR.jpg[/url]

we are sure that not exist C+V or C-V respect to hand
( bulb is making rotation but EM wave
joust making  3D background ==> exist   C speed only )

[B] matematica : [/B]
line motion  = rotation with infinity radius
(  easy to imagine and evaluate  how big  mistake we making  for each radius  )

below rocket is making rotation (infinity radius)  -  it is analogy to situation
that I showed Bulb -------rope----X .
Light for distance L need time T during this time
rocket is escaping from point 1,2,3,4...
at the end of wing rocket has got EM source
[url=http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xt2orZVnMMY/VF91acc4BFI/AAAAAAAACFM/uHVRtjhKAqk/s1600/pmm.JPG]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xt2orZVnMMY/VF91acc4BFI/AAAAAAAACFM/uHVRtjhKAqk/s1600/pmm.JPG[/url]

Above I showed also TORQUE problem ( Force can have only one point where push rocket )

[B]Experiment :[/B]

Camera is open 24 h and registering point

[url=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gThxTVotyg0/VE_qRpbPYpI/AAAAAAAACCg/Rt8lAHpo9UY/s1600/CIMG3375.JPG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gThxTVotyg0/VE_qRpbPYpI/AAAAAAAACCg/Rt8lAHpo9UY/s1600/CIMG3375.JPG[/url]

I'm sure that me and bulb and camera  during 24h test
are making rotation  respect to some point X1 ( far far point in universe )

[url=http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QAAvQuZjtmI/UOhDTjKm0uI/AAAAAAAAAbU/_g7IkKC_K00/s1600/8x.JPG]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QAAvQuZjtmI/UOhDTjKm0uI/AAAAAAAAAbU/_g7IkKC_K00/s1600/8x.JPG[/url]

Experiment
Part 1 > [url=http://youtu.be/wkz0qD17IvY]24h Michelson Morley (part 1) - YouTube[/url]  Part 2 > [url=http://youtu.be/jjqt7Iz_UDQ]24h Michelson Morley (part 2) - YouTube[/url]

conclusion
[url=http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mF862RHQBNA/VE_qFhdTZTI/AAAAAAAACCY/V3Q8y_GDAGA/s1600/25.jpg]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mF862RHQBNA/VE_qFhdTZTI/AAAAAAAACCY/V3Q8y_GDAGA/s1600/25.jpg[/url]

Michelson Morley Made Mistake ( it is FALSE experiment ) we can evaluate Our own constant
linear motion : we  need use only C and read L from picture during test

During real experiment I relize that object (doth)  is able become biger/shorter

[url=http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-arWCkT9Vr04/UwC7Q3qM0uI/AAAAAAAABlI/fJuRtMqUzbw/s1600/x.JPG]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-arWCkT9Vr04/UwC7Q3qM0uI/AAAAAAAABlI/fJuRtMqUzbw/s1600/x.JPG[/url]

more problems in test
[url=http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com/]Marosz's physics[/url]

******************************************************
[B][SIZE=5]PL[/SIZE][/B]
Mtematyczny Dowód Fa?szu Testu Michelson Morley ( szko?a ?rednia )
( pokazuje równie? prosty test do wykonania w domu )

[url=http://fizyczny.net/viewtopic.php?t=39299]http://fizyczny.net/viewtopic.php?t=39299[/url]

PL
http://fizyczny.net/viewtopic.php?t=39299