NTNUJAVA Virtual Physics Laboratory
Enjoy the fun of physics with simulations!
Backup site http://enjoy.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/ntnujava/
October 21, 2017, 06:35:03 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Knowledge and practice are one. ..."Wang Yang Ming (1472-1529, Chinese Philosopher) "
Google Bookmarks Yahoo My Web MSN Live Netscape Del.icio.us FURL Stumble Upon Delirious Ask FaceBook

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Scully's Quantum Eraser Experiment  (Read 9892 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Click to toggle author information(expand message area).
StevieT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


«
Embed this message
on: July 09, 2011, 02:12:36 pm » posted from:Wellington,Wellington,New Zealand

Hi there!

Tried to find a similiar application but no luck thus far.

I'm hoping for an application that allows me to simulate Scully's delayed choice quantum eraser experiment. Perferably with the source emitting a particle, and me being able to erase 'information' AND find out which-way (by opening a shutter) [so perhaps two screens with particle marking in the same spot] - but each screen colour coded differently to whether I did erasing (on screen 1) or find out which way info (on screen 2). Then repeating the process again (keeping the previous markings there).
Logged
Fu-Kwun Hwang
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3080



WWW
«
Embed this message
Reply #1 on: July 09, 2011, 08:38:13 pm » posted from:Taipei,T'ai-pei,Taiwan

Could you explain it in more detail? It will be even better if a simple drawing is provided.
Logged
islids
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1

«
Embed this message
Reply #2 on: July 12, 2011, 09:59:34 am » posted from:,,Thailand

Good
Logged
StevieT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


«
Embed this message
Reply #3 on: July 13, 2011, 10:08:55 am » posted from:Wellington,Wellington,New Zealand

Could you explain it in more detail? It will be even better if a simple drawing is provided.

Hi!

Here is an image for the experimental set-up, with additional information.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v608/steviet/scan0002.jpg

Cheers!
Stevie
Logged
Fu-Kwun Hwang
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3080



WWW
«
Embed this message
Reply #4 on: July 13, 2011, 02:38:05 pm » posted from:Taipei,T'ai-pei,Taiwan

You can attached image when you post forum message.


1. Do you mean there is a continue beam of atom moving toward a screen with two slits?
2. Does atom move with the same speed v (or random speed),separated by the same distance(or randomly)?
3. What do you mean by "detector click or not"??? How to decide?
4. What kind of information need to be recorded/shown? 

All the information need to be provided in order to create a simulation!


* scan0002.jpg (96.16 KB, 799x567 - viewed 886 times.)
Logged
StevieT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


«
Embed this message
Reply #5 on: July 22, 2011, 06:27:37 am » posted from:Wellington,Wellington,New Zealand

1. Do you mean there is a continue beam of atom moving toward a screen with two slits?
One excited atom at a time being sent towards the screen.[/quote]

2. Does atom move with the same speed v (or random speed),separated by the same distance(or randomly)?
Each excited atom moves at the same speed. The distance between the source and screen stays the same each time.

3. What do you mean by "detector click or not"Huh How to decide?
When only one shutter is opened, either the detector will click or not (randomly, of course obeying QM statistics). So 50% of the time a photon will be found in the top cavity; 50% of the time a photon will be found in the bottom cavity. Say we open the top shutter, and the atom had passed through the top slit, then the detector will click because a photon would be in the top cavity. If, say we had opened the bottom shutter instead, the detector won't click, which would tell us the atom took the top path and there is a photon in the top cavity.

When erasure occurs, i.e. when we open both shutters at the same time 50% of the time we get a click, and 50% of the time we don't get a click (each event occurs randomly), which is in accord with Quantum Mechanics predictions.

BOTH one shutter being opened, and both shutters being opened at the same time, will be done, for each atom that hits the final screen. Of course whether we get a click or not is random each time, but in accordance with the predictions of Quantum Theory.

4. What kind of information need to be recorded/shown?
Record where each atom hits the screen. Take two copies of that screen now, and then for copied screen 1 we'll find out which slit the atom went through, and mark the point on the screen in accordance with the key in the image I posted in a previous post. For copied screen 2, we'll erase the information, and mark the point on the screen again in accordance with the key I provided.

Each time a new atom hits the screen, leave the previous marking on the copied screen (with its coloured key point as per eraser or which-slit info) and repeat the steps done to colour the previous marking, for the new marking.


So in effect, each time we send an atom to the screen, we are doing two different experiments for the same atom, at seperate times. Each time we send an atom to the screen, we are finding out which slit it went through, and then another experiment to plot what the final screen pattern would look like HAD we done erasure instead of finding out which slit info.

Question: Will the simulation, when built, reproduce the predictions of Quantum Mechanics?

This image might help: it is the original discussion of the though experiment itself which we're going to republicate. Not sure if you've seen it before or know about it.

Logged
Fu-Kwun Hwang
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3080



WWW
«
Embed this message
Reply #6 on: July 22, 2011, 07:46:43 am » posted from:Taipei,T'ai-pei,Taiwan

I can not image there is a spatial distribution of photon on the screen from the experimental you described:

There are two slits: A and B. Photon could select  to pass either slit A or slit B.
The number being recorded are (Possible results are)
1. photon pass slit A and detector A find it.
2. photon pass slit A and detector A did find it.
3. photon pass slit B and detector B find it.
4. photon pass slit B and detector B did find it.
 
I can not find the connection between what you have described and results shown in the attached picture.
Logged
StevieT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


«
Embed this message
Reply #7 on: July 22, 2011, 01:16:11 pm » posted from:Wellington,Wellington,New Zealand

I can not image there is a spatial distribution of photon on the screen from the experimental you described:

There are two slits: A and B. Photon could select  to pass either slit A or slit B.
The number being recorded are (Possible results are)
1. photon pass slit A and detector A find it.
2. photon pass slit A and detector A did find it.
3. photon pass slit B and detector B find it.
4. photon pass slit B and detector B did find it.
 
I can not find the connection between what you have described and results shown in the attached picture.

There has always only been one detector, located between the shutters.

When you say "2. photon pass slit A and detector A did find it." do you actually mean "2. photon pass slit A and detector A didn't find it. This is completely equivalent to the point on the screen being yellow when shutter two is opened, and the detector never found it, indicating the atom went passed through slit A (the top slit), and not slit B (the bottom slit).

What is different between what the scan says, and what I've drawn on my image, is that for when what I've just described occurs (non-detection of a photon when one shutter is opened), we are colour coding those, instead of the usual X to indicate whether it goes through slit A (by detecting it from the top cavity, or not detecting it in the bottom cavity), and vice versa for the O.

When you do erasure of information - when both slits are opened the detector can click (to indicate constructive interference: remember, the photon does not exist in either cavity until you find it there, so when you open both shutters, you are getting wave interference from the possibility of the photon being in either cavity), or no click, which would indicate destructive interference -- each with 50% probability occuring. 50% of the time constructive interference occurs, 50% of the time destructive interference occurs. [see 4--> of the image]

Hope I've clarified things a bit further. Smiley
Logged
Fu-Kwun Hwang
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3080



WWW
«
Embed this message
Reply #8 on: July 22, 2011, 11:52:00 pm » posted from:Taipei,T'ai-pei,Taiwan

Are you thinking about something like the following youtube movie?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htSIjIyF9bU
Logged
StevieT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


«
Embed this message
Reply #9 on: July 23, 2011, 10:27:36 am » posted from:Wellington,Wellington,New Zealand

Yup, but with the experimental set-up of Scully, Englert and Walther.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v351/n6322/abs/351111a0.html
Logged
Fu-Kwun Hwang
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3080



WWW
«
Embed this message
Reply #10 on: July 26, 2011, 11:29:12 am » posted from:Taipei,T'ai-pei,Taiwan

I can not find the article from the above URL. (Only limited abstract and reference available).

Could you provide more information?
Logged
Pearlype
watchlist
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: -6

«
Embed this message
Reply #11 on: July 29, 2011, 03:43:48 am » posted from:-,-,ICELAND

Hi there!

Tried to find a similiar application but no luck thus far.

I'm hoping for an application that allows me to simulate Scully's delayed choice quantum eraser experiment. Perferably with the source emitting a particle, and me being able to erase 'information' AND find out which-way (by opening a shutter) [so perhaps two screens with particle marking in the same spot] - but each screen colour coded differently to whether I did erasing (on screen 1) or find out which way info (on screen 2). Then repeating the process again (keeping the previous markings there).

You make a number of valid items in your article and would likely believe many.Thank you very much this is a very nice information!. . .I use this information my practical life.

Pearlype
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
Knowledge and practice are one. ..."Wang Yang Ming (1472-1529, Chinese Philosopher) "
 
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Pendulum experiment
Molecular Workbench
concord 0 13687 Last post August 21, 2005, 09:21:34 am
by concord
Millikan oil drop experiment
Modern Physics
Fu-Kwun Hwang 2 86645 Last post October 06, 2009, 02:51:40 pm
by Fu-Kwun Hwang
Buoyancy experiment
Wave and Fluid
Fu-Kwun Hwang 0 6763 Last post April 18, 2010, 12:50:58 pm
by Fu-Kwun Hwang
Millikan oil drop experiment
modern physics
ahmedelshfie 2 16696 Last post August 02, 2010, 05:40:13 pm
by ahmedelshfie
qn about Faraday's solenoid experiment
Physics Questions
leeyiren 14 24122 Last post February 10, 2011, 08:56:13 pm
by reva_deidre85
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 5.084 seconds with 23 queries.since 2011/06/15